Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Science Fact or Cinematic Fiction



Our world is governed by the laws of physics; but in the imagined worlds of the cinema, many times this is not true. We watch movies to escape the humdrum of normal life; we enjoy seeing things that are not easily seen and or possible. Movies show us incredible feats of speed, unbelievable special effects and awesome choreography of action. Many of the things we see in the movies are impossible to do in real life. Sometimes these things are done because they are ignorant of the laws of physics. Other times it is purposely done by the directors and visual developers to create a satisfying experience for the audience as well as enhancing story. One Law that is very easily recognizable is Newton’s Third Law. Newton’s Third Law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. You can see this when you sit on a chair or when a bird flies and why it hurts when you punch a wall (because the wall’s force is pushing back on you.) This law is the reason why things recoil also. In a lot of movies this very fundamental law is often bended. Often it is bent so much and so often that people forget that the law of action and reaction applies to certain actions.
A lot of times people forget about the recoil that happens when one shoots a gun. In a movie that is all about gun shoot outs, Shoot ‘Em Up (2007) shows us ample amount of gun fighting with our main character Mr.Smith (played by Clive Owen) who is trying to save a newborn baby from an army of gunmen. Multiple times into this movie we can see Mr. Smith gunning down throngs of opposing gunmen, with many different types of guns. Nowhere in the movie did I see anyone experiencing recoil caused by the firing of the gun. There are even shots of Mr. Smith going down a fireman pole while gunning down people with a machine gun experiencing no recoil at all. While I do realize that this movie is supposed to be over the top it is also a testimony to how much recoil a gun has; television has shown so often that recoil do not happen that audiences are used to seeing that response from firing a gun. Not only are there no recoil to the gun firing, there are also too much reaction from the victim who are shot in this movie. The amount of force exerted by the bullet will be dispersed by the human body and the body should not be propelled from the shooting. Even though the physics are wrong in this movie, I do believe that it is done on purpose. The audience needs to see their hero strong, unaffected by silly things such as recoil. They need someone to whom they want to be or one that they can relate too. Everyone wants to be the capable gunmen. Also, the audience needs to understand when a cast has been shot. I believe that is why the actors react in that manner – even though it is not physically correct.
We can also find mistakes in the movie Wanted (2008) starring James McAvoy as a disgruntled office worker that discovers the world of professional assassins with superhuman killing abilities – that is the ability to bend the path of action of bullets. We will focus at the last few minutes of the movie; the scene takes place in the office building. We see one of the assassins in the elevator, when suddenly the metal of the elevators wall spontaneously crushes – supposedly as a reaction to the extreme force that the assassin’s feet is exerting on the metal wall. This is impossible. The reaction happened before he pushes on the metal wall, and in fact – the feet did not even push into the wall. This scene was an attempt to show action and reaction; but instead it rings false because the forces that are supposed to be equal are instead unequal and the timing is not simultaneous. Another example is the jump the assassin took right after he bolts through the hallway of the office building. He hardly makes any anticipation, the assassin did not look like he exerted much force when he jumped through the glass but the assassin flies through the air as if he’s propelled by a cannon. Not only was the jump distance feels too long, the hang time the assassin had from that jump also felt very wrong. Realistically, I imagine the force it took to break the glass would be enough of an opposite force on the assassin that it would make the assassin fall short on his jump. In this case I believe they try to adhere to the laws of physics – but in the end the effect they want to achieve on the audience was to astound. However it is not done well and it fails to look believable, which harms the movie because it takes the audience’s mind outside of the story.
Lastly we will examine The Matrix (1999) starring Keanu Reeves. This movie does happen in another world that is not earth; however there are several things that I found a little odd, even though it could be explained by it being in another universe. In the scene where Neo and Morpheus is fighting their moves feels a bit airy – as if gravity is not acting as strongly upon them. This is reminiscent of old Chinese Kung Fu films that I use to watch as a child. They have light movements and high jumps without any anticipation because in real life they wear harnesses. (often the harnesses can be seen, especially in old movies.) I suspect this is what the actors are doing in this scene, we can see that the anticipation that Neo takes before leaping is definitely not equal to the powerful jump that comes afterwards. Scientifically, the force that Neo pushes on the floor should equal the amount of force the floor affects him. Since Neo uses little force on the floor – the floor should give little force back. This however did not happen, which is why the audience will feel as if the movements are odd.
In conclusion, Laws of Physics such as Newton’s Third Law are consistently broken by movie makers for many different reasons. The action genre legitimizes the overreaction of certain forces to indicate outstanding strength, drama and movement. Many different deviations can be seen through unequal forces, not simultaneous timing and the overreaction of forces or the lack of recoil.  This particular physics are done on purpose to dramatize and to excite the audience. The job of an action movie is to excite the audience and to thrill them this is why they bend the laws so much to their breaking point.

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Outline of Second Term Paper



Science Fact or Cinematic Fiction?
Law: Action and Reaction
Movies: Wanted (2007) , The Matrix (1999), Shoot ‘Em Up (2007)
1.       Intro
a.       Introduce topic, how physics are portrayed in movie to create a believable and satisfying reaction for the audience.
b.      Introduce movies and genre, relate how topic is related to the movies
c.       Describe Action and Reaction (Newton’s Third Law) and how it applies to every movie
2.       Wanted
a.       Short synopsis of the movie
b.      Last few minutes of the movie, scene in the office building
                                                               i.      Metal of elevator wall spontaneously crushes by itself
                                                             ii.      Unrealistic jump distance and hang time.
c.       Explanation why shot is unrealistic and incorrect.
d.      How it would look like realistically
3.       Shoot ‘Em Up
a.       Synopsis of the movie
b.      Any shot in the movie where the main character guns down people.
                                                               i.      No recoil on the body of the shooter
                                                             ii.      Too much reaction on the victims who are shot.
c.       Explanation of how inaccuracy relates to action and reaction
d.      How it would look like if it was real
4.       The Matrix
a.       Synopsis
b.      Neo and Morpheus fighting scene
                                                               i.      Reminiscent of Chinese kung fu films
                                                             ii.      Characters do not have anticipation before jumps/big movements
c.       Explanation why it does not feel right.
d.      Having correct physics would look right
5.       Conclusion
a.       Summation of points
b.      Reasons why genre legitimates somewhat physics deviations.
c.       World where characters are  living in  play effects on the physics portrayed
d.      Restate Thesis

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Stop Motion Animation of Falling


This animation was made with a lot of help from Edric Yamamoto. I wanted to use my bear, falling from a great height. I drew storyboards to plan the animation and later photographed the bear falling from the fridge. I took pictures of myself holding the bear. Then in photoshop i painted myself out. 

After i fixed the shots, I had to put them together in After Effects and Premier. I also added a song just to make it a little more fun. This was fun to do! I just wish i can be better prepared the next time i do it. 

Special thanks to Edric Yamamoto :) !